I object to SSD-89673472 at Glenfield, NSW. The exhibited development application should not be approved in its current form because the proposal asks the consent authority to accept material planning and amenity impacts while key evidence remains incomplete, fragile or insufficiently tested.
My local context is: I am a local resident near the site. This is a general sample submission prepared before individual residents add the specific details only they know. The development application is SSD-89673472, a development application before NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. The key concerns are truck movements and road safety, noise from 24/7 operations and air quality and dust.
1. Truck movements and road safety. The proposal has not demonstrated that its impacts on truck movements and road safety are acceptable for nearby residents, and the exhibited material should be tested on this point before any approval. The current record says: "Based on the resident's stated local knowledge; the exhibited application material should be checked on this point." (Resident-supplied information — verify against the exhibited material). This should be assessed against Relevant planning controls and public interest assessment.
2. Noise from 24/7 operations. The proposal has not demonstrated that its impacts on noise from 24/7 operations are acceptable for nearby residents, and the exhibited material should be tested on this point before any approval. The current record says: "Based on the resident's stated local knowledge; the exhibited application material should be checked on this point." (Resident-supplied information — verify against the exhibited material). This should be assessed against Relevant planning controls and public interest assessment.
3. Air quality and dust. The proposal has not demonstrated that its impacts on air quality and dust are acceptable for nearby residents, and the exhibited material should be tested on this point before any approval. The current record says: "Based on the resident's stated local knowledge; the exhibited application material should be checked on this point." (Resident-supplied information — verify against the exhibited material). This should be assessed against Relevant planning controls and public interest assessment.
For those reasons, I ask NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure to refuse the application unless the applicant resolves the identified statutory and evidentiary gaps. Require corrected and independently reviewable supporting material before any favourable determination.
This sample is drafting support, not legal advice. Verify every point against the exhibited material before lodging anything.