Object to property development. Intelligently.

Pick the proposal, tell us what only you know, and get a structured objection — grounds, evidence points and a letter — to review, edit and lodge yourself.

Start your objection

Free, about 2 minutes. Nothing is lodged or sent.

Start my draft
Already wrote one? Check it instead
No account needed
Nothing lodged for you
Verify before you send
See every NSW SSD open for submissions right now
How it works
1

Pick the proposal

Choose a listed development or describe your own.

2

Tell us what only you know

Your street, your window, your morning traffic.

3

Copy, download or share

A structured draft you review, edit and lodge yourself.

The output

Not a wall of text. A structured objection.

Every draft breaks your concerns into numbered grounds with the argument, the record point to check, and the planning benchmark it should be assessed against — plus a letter ready for your own voice.

Write yours
Sample draft
Draft objection for SSD-97528708
142-148 and 160 Oxford Street, Paddington NSW

1.Height and bulk exceed the prevailing controls

High

The proposed built form relies on an uplift that has not been justified against the scale of the surrounding Paddington heritage conservation area, and the visual impact assessment does not test the closest affected terraces.

“The exhibited urban design report assesses view impacts from Oxford Street only, not the residential streets to the south.”
Source Urban design report, exhibited application material
Assess against Local environmental plan height controls and SSD assessment guidelines

2.Privacy and overlooking of adjoining terraces

Material

Upper-level balconies and windows directly face the private open space of adjoining homes with no separation study or screening plan in the exhibited drawings.

“The architectural plans show upper-level openings within 12 metres of rear boundaries without screening details.”
Source Architectural drawing set, exhibited application material
Assess against Apartment Design Guide separation and privacy provisions
What I’m asking for
  • Refuse the application unless the applicant resolves the identified evidentiary gaps.
  • Require corrected and independently reviewable supporting material before any favourable determination.

Sample based on a public SSD exhibition — every draft must be verified against the official record.

Already have a draft?

Get a readiness score and a stronger version in one minute.

Check my objection
Responsible use

Built around human verification, not blind automation.

ObjectionEngine makes the drafting clearer and faster without pretending the planning record checks itself. You remain responsible for what is true, current and ready to submit.

Official source checking

You still verify planning controls, authority records, exhibition dates and lodgement rules against the authoritative material.

No legal-advice boundary

The product supports evidence construction and drafting. It does not create a solicitor-client relationship or lodge material for you.

Your words, your decision

Results are shown to you only. A result is published at a public link only when you explicitly choose to share it, and you can unshare it any time.

Responsible platform boundary

No automatic lodgement, no claim of legal advice, and no promise that planning controls or deadlines are current without user verification.

For teams

For project teams and planning professionals.

The same engine, at matter scale: evidence registers, issue analysis and report drafting for the developments your team is responding to.

Preview workspaceDeveloper access
ObjectionEngine evidence register interface

Development matter workspace

The proposal, pathway, authority, exhibition window and response work in one project record.

Application evidence register

Claims, page references, drawings and reviewer status that shape a response or submission.

Issue and objection analysis

Public concerns turned into structured planning issues and report-ready findings.

Drafting surfaces

From rough notes to editable objection, response and briefing material with human review.